Terror TV Pays Al Gore $100 Million for U.S. Media Access

Source: http://www.aim.org/aim-column/terror-tv-pays-al-gore-100-million-for-u-s-media-access/

Al-Jazeera, once considered the voice of Osama bin-Laden and known for anti-American and anti-Semitic rhetoric, has announced the purchase of Al Gore’s low-rated cable channel, Current TV, in a transparent attempt to buy access to the U.S. media market for operatives of the pro-terrorist Muslim Brotherhood. Gore has reportedly made $100 million from the $500 million deal.

The Arab government-funded TV channel, labeled “Jihad TV” by Judea Pearl, father of slain journalist Daniel Pearl, says the purpose of the unprecedented acquisition of Current TV is to create a channel called “Al-Jazeera America” and reach a potential audience of 40 million U.S. homes. It claims this will bring Al-Jazeera “into closer competition with American news channels like CNN, MSNBC and Fox.”

Current TV features liberal programs hosted by such figures as former Democratic governors Jennifer Granholm and Eliot Spitzer. These programs will presumably go off the air as the channel takes on the Jihadist leanings that characterize Al-Jazeera’s Arabic and English channels.

But it is not at all clear that the new “Al-Jazeera America” will be able to hang on to Current TV’s existing contracts with cable television providers.

As noted by writer Henry Blodgett, “…Al Jazeera wanted access to America’s TV viewers—specifically, the cable distribution contracts that enable Current to be watched in tens of millions of American households.”

But Current TV co-owner Joel Hyatt, in a Wednesday memo to employees, revealed that one of Current’s distributors, Time Warner Cable, did not consent to the sale to Al-Jazeera and as a result “Current will no longer be carried on TWC.”

Even after Time Warner dumped Current because of the sale, Current TV is available in about 30 million American households, notes Blodgett. But the cable distributors into those remaining households will have the same right as Time Warner to drop the channel as its programming changes. Whether they do this or not will depend on public opinion and reaction to the blatant power grab by the regime in Qatar and its attempt to manipulate the U.S. media market.

Many observers are watching the cable giant Comcast, which owns about 10 percent of Current TV, for its next move.

AIM originally raised awareness on the issue in 2006 with the documentary, Terror Television: The Rise of Al-Jazeera and the Hate-America Media, and was instrumental in defeating the channel’s efforts to seek carriage in U.S. markets.

Jeff Timmons, a communications lawyer, told AIM that there are federal restrictions on foreigners owning the means of communication but not the programming itself. As a result, he foresees no successful legal challenges to Qatar’s acquisition of Current TV.

But Florida broadcaster Jerry Kenney, a strong critic of Al-Jazeera’s attempts to enter the U.S. media market, says, “If this doesn’t fall under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, nothing does.”

Kenney had previously filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice alleging that Al-Jazeera and other foreign propaganda channels are violating the law by not disclosing in their broadcasts that they are agents of foreign powers. Other foreign channels operating in the U.S. include Moscow-funded Russia Today (RT), Iranian Press TV and the Chinese regime’s CCTV.

According to Kenney, “Al-Jazeera America” should be required to register under the law and identify its broadcasts on the air as foreign propaganda.

But will conservatives in Congress challenge Qatar’s media power play?

The “Emir” or dictator of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, financially sponsors Al-Jazeera and postures as a friend of the United States. His regime spends lavishly on public relations and lobbying in the U.S., including Congressional junkets to Qatar, visits to Al-Jazeera studios, and fancy media conferences with representative of terrorist groups at expensive hotels.

Although Al-Jazeera has been portrayed by some in the U.S. media as an exercise in freedom of press and speech, it can be a crime to criticize Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani in Qatar itself. Bloggers and others who do criticize the regime sometimes disappear at the hands of the security forces. A recent case involves a Qatari poet who received a life sentence after a secret trial for a verse of poetry said to be insulting to the emir.

Al-Jazeera’s most famous media personality is the anti-American and anti-Semitic cleric Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi. He returned to Egypt from his base in Qatar to supervise the transformation of that one-time U.S. ally into an Islamic state after the Obama-backed revolution there.

Last October the Emir of Qatar made a massive $400 million donation to Hamas, an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood, making the Qatari regime in effect a state sponsor of terrorism even while hosting a U.S. military base. Obama himself hosted the Emir in 2011, calling him “Your Highness.”

Al-Jazeera was regarded by the Bush Administration as hostile to American interests after the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 when information surfaced showing that the channel’s  managing director, Mohammed Jassem al-Ali, had been acting as an agent of the Saddam Hussein regime.

The Obama Administration, however, has praised Al-Jazeera, with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton saying the channel had provided “real news” coverage of the Middle East riots and revolution that ushered in a Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt and the rise of Islamists in such countries as Libya and Syria.

Although the channel masquerades as an independent “news” operation, the U.S. State Department’s own human rights report on Qatar notes that “the government exercised editorial and programmatic control of the channel through funding and selection of the station’s management.”

As such, the assumption is that the Obama Administration encouraged the sale of Current TV, since it financially benefits not only Al Gore and Joel Hyatt, the other co-owner who is also a prominent Democrat, but the Muslim Brotherhood and its backers in Qatar.

We noted in a 2008 column, “Al-Jazeera for Obama,” that the channel promoted Barack Obama’s candidacy for the presidency and that one of its reporters actually contributed financially to the Obama campaign.

A website associated with Glenn Beck confirms that Glenn Beck and TheBlaze TV, a television network owned by the former Fox News personality, tried to purchase Current TV and were rejected. “Had TheBlaze successfully purchased Current TV, the current lineup of TheBlaze TV would have replaced the existing progressive programming in 59 million homes in the United States,” Beck’s website reports.

Hyatt reportedly wanted to turn over Current TV to an entity aligned with his own “point of view” and rejected Beck on that basis because of Beck’s conservative outlook.

For many years, mostly because of vigorous opposition from Accuracy in Media, Al-Jazeera failed to get widespread carriage in the U.S. media and has been viewed as an organ of enemy propaganda in an ongoing terrorist war that began with al-Qaeda attacks on September 11, 2001, that claimed almost 3,000 lives in New York City and the Pentagon. The 9/11 commission report noted (on page 90) that Qatar had been protecting terrorists, including the mastermind of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Al-Jazeera became known after the 9/11 attacks as a reliable outlet for the propaganda statements and videos of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Al-Jazeera’s Kabul, Afghanistan-based reporter Tayseer Allouni conducted interviews with Osama bin Laden and was later convicted of being an agent of al Qaeda and sentenced to seven years in prison in Spain.

On the other hand, Al-Jazeera promoted conspiracy theories that Muslim terrorists were not really behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Despite the bad image, controversial programming, and terrorist connections, Al-Jazeera Arabic gave rise to an Al-Jazeera English channel that desperately tried to get access to the American media through cable giants such as Comcast by claiming that it was fair and impartial in its programming.

The high-powered campaign suffered a major setback when former ABC Nightline correspondent Dave Marash quit his anchor job at Al-Jazeera English, citing anti-American bias and saying that the “standard for journalism on Al-Jazeera in the United States didn’t seem consistently to be as good as their standards elsewhere.”

Comcast has refused to carry the channel on a national basis, although Al-Jazeera’s programs are carried on some of its cable systems in cities such as Washington, D.C. In addition, Jerry Kenney has documented how Al-Jazeera and other propaganda channels are getting access to the U.S. media market through dozens of taxpayer-supported public television stations that carry their programs in violation of Federal Communications Commission rules. The Virginia-based taxpayer-supported broadcaster MHz Networks isthe vehicle for these questionable transmissions on behalf of regimes in Qatar, Russia and China.


Een gedachte over “Terror TV Pays Al Gore $100 Million for U.S. Media Access

  1. Source: https://www.fastcompany.com/1733536/al-jazeera-talks-comcast-time-warner

    Al Jazeera in Talks With Comcast, Time Warner


    Al Jazeera English

    Al Jazeera English may be coming to American television screens. The Qatar-based network is currently in talks with cable giants Comcast and Time Warner, creating a groundswell of enthusiasm among American news junkies and a collective groan from right-leaning conservative activists. At the moment, Al Jazeera English is only available on a handful of local cable outlets in Washington, D.C., Burlington, Vt., and a few other locales.

    Executives from Al Jazeera were caught by the Philadelphia press visiting Comcast’s headquarters in the northeastern city. To be fair, Al Jazeera has been diligent in letting journalists know that it was lobbying for a Comcast slot. The network sent out a press release announcing that they handed over a massive pile of 13,000 letters from Americans who wanted to watch Al Jazeera English to Comcast executives:

    [Al Jazeera English] arrived at Comcast’s HQ in Philadelphia with boxes of emails garnered from their online campaign to gain national carriage. The channel provided a facility on their website for Americans to email their local cable provider. Over 40,000 emails were lodged in the first few weeks of the campaign this month. 13,000 of these were for Comcast who requested that they all be printed out and delivered to them.
    Other meetings were reportedly held with Time Warner and Cablevision. Distribution talks are ongoing.

    Al Jazeera has organized a web-based promotional campaign called Demand Al Jazeera over the past few years in an attempt to boost its presence on the American cable scene. Despite the network’s impeccable news gathering chops, a widespread sentiment exists in the United States—especially among certain segments of the conservative movement and right-leaning pundits such as Bill O’Reilly—that Al Jazeera somehow aids and abets terrorists. In Philadelphia itself, Philadelphia magazine supported Al Jazeera’s attempts to get on Comcast with a piece explaining that Al Jazeera is not “anti-American.”

    News coverage on Al Jazeera English self-consciously poses itself as being the voice of the “global south” and highlights regions often neglected by American or other Anglophone news organizations. Al Jazeera employs more staff in Latin America than CNN or the BBC and frequently reports on goings-on in subsaharan Africa and southeastern Asia. The network also tilts highbrow in a sort of New Yorker sense: It is hard to imagine CNN or Fox News airing a talk show where philosophers Slavoj Zizek and Tariq Ramadan debate the ramifications of modernity and the evolution of protest movements, for instance. Al Jazeera has also won accolades for its amazing on-the-ground reporting from the Arab Revolutions of 2011, with reporters and an excellent social media outreach effort gaining jaw-dropping footage from Cairo, Tunis, and other trouble spots.

    Meanwhile, Al Jazeera English’s editorial stance often diverges from that of Al Jazeera Arabic, which sometimes appears to promote a pan-Arab rather than Global South outlook, and which hosted a religious talk show by Muslim Brotherhood leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi that expressed anti-American, anti-homosexual and anti-Jewish opinions. Al Jazeera English and Al Jazeera Arabic are editorially independent of each other and share only a common corporate structure; the bulk of Al Jazeera Arabic’s broadcasting is aimed at Arabic-speaking countries and expatriates abroad. However, Al Jazeera Arabic has also introduced a surprisingly persistent willingness to question government and authority into previously docile Arabic-language television news.

    Both the English and Arabic networks have been accused by academic experts such as Philip Seib and Hugh Miles of functioning as a source of diplomatic leverage for the Qatari government—Al Jazeera is owned by Qatari Sheik Hamad bin Thamer al-Thani and maintains intimate ties to the royal family. Al Jazeera maintains headquarters in the Qatari capital of Doha and was founded by royal decree in 1996; the Emir of Kuwait, Sheik Hamid bin Khalifa al-Thani, also gave the network extensive financial support.

    Despite its campaign, gaining a slot on American cable could prove difficult for Al Jazeera English. Channel listings on Comcast and Time Warner are dominated by a handful of media giants such as Time Warner (again), Scripps, and Discovery Networks that very much run an old boys’ network. Al Jazeera—though rich in influence with news professionals, academics, and politicians—is new arrival with little leverage and a potential market share that is small in numbers, with limited in television-watching hours. But the Arab Revolutions have turned it into a must-watch channel; if there was ever a time for Al Jazeera English to appear on American television screens, it is now.

    For more stories like this, follow @fastcompany on Twitter. Email Neal Ungerleider, the author of this article, here.


Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Google+ photo

Je reageert onder je Google+ account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )


Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )


Verbinden met %s